Had his dreams remained just dreams, Dharmendra could well have been driving a tractor in the verdant fields of Punjab all through the years during which he was, instead, one of the biggest stars of Hindi cinema. Born Dharminder Singh Deol on 8 December 1935 in Nasrali, a peaceful village in Ludhiana district, Punjab, to schoolteacher Kewal Kishan Singh and Satwant Kaur, his family had its roots in the nearby less-than-a-dot-on-the-map village of Dangon, near Pakhowal, Ludhiana. Dharminder Singh spent his early life in the village of Sahnewal and studied at Government Senior Secondary School at Lalton Kalan in Ludhiana district, where his father was the
headmaster. He later did his Intermediate from Ramgarhia College, Phagwara, in 1952. This multitude of places associated with him, as he grew into his teenage years, became the raison d’etre for the many differences of views about his roots. Never mind if, today, Dharminder Singh, known to the world as Dharmendra (meaning the God of religion), belongs to not just the entire country, but perhaps, to the globe. Wherever Indian cinema is watched and cherished, he is, simply, one of the biggest and longest-lasting stellar entities, belonging to what is now the biggest film industry in the world…
Dharmendra spoke to me about his early ambitions during our first interview meeting in 2011. Since he was a simple boy from Punjab who wanted to set out to enter the big, bad world of films, how had his family reacted? The actor told me, ‘My father wasn’t happy because he was not too sure of the outcome, and of what would happen if I met with failure. My mother, however, was always supportive.’ So the obvious question that comes to mind is: Why did the young Dharam have stardust in his eyes? Candidly, he said, ‘I was in awe of the stars like Dilip (Kumar) saab, Raj (Kapoor) saab and even heroines like Nargis, Madhubala and Vyjayanthimala. But my ambitions were quite restricted! My big dream and my simple prayer to God was my pictures being present everywhere, just like those of my idols.’ A naive and simple Dharmendra was not at all bothered whether he earned no money, a little money, or a lot! He said: ‘My goal was very simple one flat and one Fiat (car)! When I came to Bombay that’s what Mumbai was known as then I only had my dreams. I was an untutored villager, with no idea of acting. I wasn’t even aware [that] I was good-looking until I began getting movie offers because of my good looks. When I arrived here, I was in fact shocked by the lifestyles of the stars it was far different from what I had imagined back in Punjab!’ So, what had actually stirred the pot and made the lad wish to get into films? What was, so to speak, the churning point? The answer to this was as simple as the man himself: Years ago, he had gone with his uncle for a relative’s wedding to a nearby town.
Suddenly, life changed for the young boy. The images from the film began to haunt him. Nothing else was of any interest. His mother continued to tell the boy fairy tales and inspirational stories; the grocer in the village continued his spell of ghost stories, but young Dharam was no longer the avid listener. He believed in the boy Ram from the film, who grew up to be a freedom fighter enacted by the famous Dilip Kumar. He felt Ram and he were brothers. He began to spend a lot of time on his own, with thoughts of the little boy (interestingly played by one Sashi Kapur, who had nothing to do with Shashi Kapoor!) from Shaheed for ‘company’. He felt that he knew and understood him, and he certainly wanted to be like him and grow up to be in an interesting interplay of reel and real Dilip Kumar! Years passed and Dharam grew into a strapping young man. He even joined an American drilling company as what he now calls ‘a mechanic’. Around this time, it is said Dharam Singh lost his virginity to an older woman, and also had his first drink in the company of his American colleagues from the drilling company. In 1954, he married Prakash Kaur. But the ambitions of becoming an actor continued to seethe within him like lava waiting to erupt from a dormant volcano. His visits to Ludhiana city to watch films became more and more frequent. Dharam found these to-and-fro journeys tedious, but everything was worth it just to watch the great actors he had come to adore and wanted to emulate… and his vision If you thought that working long hours may help you please your boss, think twice. According to a survey, people who work longer shifts typically make nine per cent more errors than those on shorter shifts. This demonstrates that attention spans drift over a long work day, says a survey by Global software
firm Pegasystems Inc, while revealing how ineffective software and poor processes are hindering productivity for many workers.
The survey found that workers are saddled with too many of disconnected apps, leading to poor processes, increased errors, and wasted actions that could otherwise be automated. From digital distractions to extraneous activities, there are many events over the course of the day that take workers’ attention away from productive tasks. Workers check their email 10 times per hour, or once every six minutes, throughout the course of their day. Employees spend 13 per cent of their time on email, of which only 23 per cent is spent on value-generating work. On average, workers perform 134 “copy and paste” actions each day — highlighting how often employees must switch between applications using same data to complete a task. “Many organisations instinctively try to solve process issues and improve employee productivity by throwing more software at the problem without truly understanding the root cause of their inefficiencies,” said Don Schuerman, CTO, Pegasystems, in a statement on Wednesday.Employees commit 845 keying errors per day or once out of every 14 key strokes, which shows the potential to automate more of their workflow to reduce manual mistakes. Workers multitasking between 30 applications or more in a single shift have a 28 per cent higher error rate than those using fewer apps. “By streamlining these processes and eliminating repetitive tasks, companies can give employees the right tools they need to succeed and be happier in their jobs,” Schuerman said. The survey is based on the analysis of nearly five million hours of desktop activity of operational support employees who primarily perform routine back office, data entry, or contact
center tasks at Global 2000 companies from January to September.
For more news updates Follow and Like us on Facebook