Chandigarh: The ruling Shiromani Akali Dal(SAD) today declared that it would not allow the construction of the Sutlej Yamuna Link canal and said Punjab has not a drop of water to spare for any other state.
The core committee of the SAD at a meeting declared its firm resolve not to allow the construction of the Sutlej Yamuna Link (SYL) canal as that will deprive Punjab of its legitimate claim on the waters of the rivers that flow through it.
“Punjab neither has a drop a water to spare for any other state, nor is there any legal or constitutional provision by which it can be deprived of its right over the waters of rivers that flow through it, nor will even a single drop of water belonging to Punjab be allowed to be taken out of the state,” the SAD observed.
The Core Committee of SAD asked the President to ignore the advice of the Supreme Court as it did not answer any of the issues raised by him.
“We stand by the Constitution and the Constitution guarantees us absolute and exclusive right over the waters of rivers that flow through it. If Punjab cannot get water from Ravi and Beas, will it get it from Brahmaputra and Tung Bhadra?” felt the Core Committee members.
A resolution passed at the Core Committee meeting today said, “The SYL is neither necessary, nor feasible, nor is there a single drop of spare water available to flow through it, nor will it be allowed to be built.
“Punjab itself faces the horrific prospect of turning into a desert because of acute water scarcity and shocking pace at which the sub soil water level is falling.
“Besides, no state through which a river does not flow can be given water forcibly,” said the resolution.
Giving details of the Core Committee meeting proceedings, party’s general secretary and Chief Spokesperson Harcharan Bains said that the party is concerned and surprised over the advice of the Supreme Court to the President “which completely overlooks the purpose for which the President had sought the apex court’s opinion.
The Core Committee said the Supreme Court’s advice, does not answer of the four issues addressed to it by the President of India.
The first of these issues was whether the Termination of Agreements Act 2004 was illegal and unconstitutional.
The Apex court did not answer that, he said.
The Court was required to give details of provisions to support its opinion, he said adding that it did not offer any.
For more news updates Follow and Like us on Facebook